Nigeria’s financial sector is once again in the throes of a historic transformation. With just six months left before the Central Bank of Nigeria’s (CBN) March 2026 deadline for banks to meet new capital thresholds, the race to recapitalise has reached fever pitch.
While tier-one lenders and a handful of foreign-owned banks appear to have successfully crossed the finish line, more than 10 mid-tier and smaller players remain trapped in a high-stakes battle to raise fresh equity. The picture is further complicated by the insurance industry, which has now entered its own recapitalisation cycle, intensifying the scramble for a limited pool of domestic and foreign investors.
For some, this is déjà vu. The ghost of the 2005 consolidation, which reduced 89 banks to 25 through mergers, acquisitions, and liquidations, looms large. Only this time, the stakes are arguably higher: the banking sector is more globally integrated, investor sentiment is more cautious, and the macroeconomic headwinds facing the country are far harsher.
At the heart of the struggle is a growing crisis of confidence. Many investors are wary of committing funds to mid-tier and small lenders whose books they believe conceal more problems than published accounts reveal.
“Investors are sitting on the fence because they suspect some of these banks are carrying legacy liabilities that will surface after recapitalisation,” one investment banker said. “Nobody wants to be caught funding a bailout in disguise.”
That wariness is amplified by recent experiences. Fidelity Bank’s inheritance of a $3 million debt from the defunct FSB International Bank during the 2005 recapitalisation remains a cautionary tale. Analysts warn that rushed mergers without rigorous due diligence could leave acquiring banks saddled with toxic obligations that threaten long-term stability.
Against this backdrop, talk of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) has picked up pace. Yet, in practice, very few deals have crossed the line.
Disagreements over governance structures, disclosures, and cultural integration are proving major stumbling blocks. In several cases, boardroom wrangling has stalled talks that appeared promising just months ago.
“Even where the numbers align, issues like who controls the new entity and how legacy debts are treated often derail negotiations,” a senior bank executive explained.
The uncertainty is creating unease in the market. Insiders warn that last-minute, regulator-driven marriages of convenience could destroy corporate identities, trigger heavy equity losses, and ultimately weaken consumer confidence in the banking system.
According to CBN Governor Olayemi Cardoso, eight institutions have already scaled the new capital hurdle, while about 10 more are awaiting regulatory clearance. That leaves a cluster of smaller banks still struggling — and increasingly vulnerable.
Unity Bank and Polaris Bank offer a telling example. Nearly a year after the CBN approved their proposed merger, the deal remains in limbo. While progress has been reported, the delay underscores how complicated even regulator-backed consolidations can become. Analysts say a successful conclusion of the Unity–Polaris deal could set the tone for similar transactions and ease wider market anxiety.
Meanwhile, tier-one giants such as Zenith, Access, UBA, and GTCO, which moved early to strengthen their capital bases, have turned the recapitalisation race into an opportunity. By aggressively courting foreign investors, issuing rights offers, and exploring eurobond options, they have positioned themselves to dominate a post-recapitalisation landscape that may see a thinning of the field.
The challenge for struggling banks is compounded by the insurance sector, which has only recently unveiled its own recapitalisation roadmap. The entry of insurance firms into the market for fresh equity has dramatically increased competition for investors.
“Fund managers who had earlier pledged to support some mid-tier banks are now reassessing their commitments because of opportunities in insurance, where entry multiples may be more attractive,” a Lagos-based analyst noted.
This has forced smaller lenders into consultations with investment advisers to accelerate capital-raising plans. But with six months to go, the fear is that many will be unable to close their books in time, leaving mergers or outright liquidation as the only options.
The CBN has repeatedly insisted that there will be no extension of the March 2026 deadline, signalling its intent to drive through another round of consolidation no matter the collateral damage. For depositors and investors, the key question is whether the regulator will strike the right balance between building stronger banks and avoiding a repeat of the destabilising fallout that followed the 2009 banking crisis.
What is certain is that Nigeria’s banking sector is on the cusp of a dramatic reshaping. The coming months will determine whether today’s strugglers reinvent themselves through bold partnerships and fresh capital, or whether they become footnotes in the next chapter of Nigerian banking history.
Leave a Reply